Search for: "People v. House"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 12,999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2010, 6:31 am
The Fourth Amendment guarantees “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am
Ideally, we expect people to emerge from the experience of a criminal case, which may or may not include prison time, as having reformed their conduct and with the desire to move forward as positive and productive members of the community. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
Silverman v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 4:12 pm
I accept the formulation of Ouseley J in O’Brien v Basildon District Council [2007] 1 P&CR 16. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 4:12 pm
I accept the formulation of Ouseley J in O’Brien v Basildon District Council [2007] 1 P&CR 16. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 7:56 am
The plaintiff in White v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 12:44 pm
Lillis v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
I got this case confused with Terry v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 3:38 pm
Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809 and Antoniades v Villiers; A-G Securities v Vaughan [1990] AC 417, HL. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:55 am
As Wikipedia notes, the amendment states that [t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.[ [emphasis added]. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:52 am
Today, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
Had the filibuster failed, the White House vowed to veto the bill. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:24 pm
The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals (Watson, P.C. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 9:05 pm
“In Yim v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 3:02 am
Bogan v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:21 am
Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:39 am
Once the story is stripped of its ramming the barricade myth, however, there is no justification under Tennessee v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:45 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Capitol Records, LLC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 1:56 pm
Curo Places Ltd v Walker [2018] EWHC 2462 (QB) This was Curo Places appeal of a Circuit Judge’s dismissal of its possession claim against Ms Walker. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 12:33 pm
Earlier this year in Collins v. [read post]
