Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 2741 - 2760
of 44,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2009, 1:28 pm
Last month,in People v Weaver (5/12/09)(discussed here, the Court of Appeals held that the New York Constitution requires that a warrant issued upon probable cause be issued before the police can monitor someone's whereabouts by surreptitiously attaching an electronic device (GPS) to that person's automobile. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 9:58 am
WHAT: Hearing in Center for Genetics and Society v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
§ 15A-1413(b)(l3) provides that a probation officer may, at reasonable times, conduct warrantless searches of a probationer’s person and STATE V. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:01 am
Nixon v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 12:26 am
[www.nylj.com]
People, respondent v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm
As such, many gamers bought Plants v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 1:44 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:02 am
So this may perhaps be a continuing feature.I initially intended to make no comments about the new section. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
Allied Modular * Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?) [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:58 am
See George & Co., 575 F.3d at 398 (4th Cir. 2009) (“[e]vidence of only a small number of instances of actual confusion may be dismissed as de minimis. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 7:32 am
, Moore v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Bragdon v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Supreme Court held in 2006 in Burlington Northern v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 4:23 am
The case- People v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 9:23 am
Snap and Grossman v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
In Florence v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
People v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 1:53 am
We thus "may presume that the matter was properly before that court" (People v Chad S., 237 AD2d 986, lv denied 90 NY2d 856; see People v Hurd, 12 AD3d 1198, 1199, lv denied 4 NY3d 764).But in both People v Chad S. (237 AD2d 986) and People v Hurd (12 A.D.3d 1198) the Court had found that "the record fails to establish that defendant did not waive a preliminary hearing, that a hearing was not held, or… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
He continued: “v) The relevance of the threat to public order should not be taken as meaning that the risk of violence by those reacting to the protest is, without more, determinative; some times it may be that protesters are to be protected. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:53 pm
He rightly accepted that serious harm may be inferred. [read post]
