Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 2741 - 2760 of 4,038
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” One can still read the Missouri statute, plausibly, to make his behavior a crime.In a 2009 case, United States v. [read post]
The wire must be firmly fastened to plastic, metal, or wooden posts securely planted in the earth. [read post]
The wire must be firmly fastened to plastic, metal, or wooden posts securely planted in the earth. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:50 am
Hansen spoke on behalf of the petitioners; General Verrilli on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae; Mr. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:17 pm by Rebecca Edelson and Emilio Cazares
Oftentimes, potential investors will be invited to an on-site visit for a tour of a lab or processing plant, potentially exposing them to trade secrets. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm by David Pozen
Schedule I of the CSA imposes a complete criminal ban; schedules II through V allow drugs to be prescribed under certain conditions. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:14 am
This is the interesting question that the US Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit recently addressed in Rentmeester v Nike. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:26 am by Peter Vickery
The source of the uncertainty is the recent decision in Noel Canning v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   ¨     Sierra Club v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm by Eric Lorber
 In a recent decision, the Supreme Court said that agencies do.In Decker v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by Clarence T.
It includes, but is not limited to: (i) Kits used, intended for use, or designed for use in planting, propagating, cultivating, growing or harvesting of any species of plant which is a controlled substance or from which a controlled substance can be derived; (ii) Kits used, intended for use, or designed for use in manufacturing, compounding, converting, producing, processing or preparing controlled substances; (iii) Isomerization devices used, intended for use or designed for use… [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) – US: Federal Circuit revises Amgen v ITC (Patently-O) (Patent Baristas) (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Hal Wegner) (Patent Docs)   General Alicia Greenidge to step down as Director of IFPMA (Intellectual Property Watch) Flu crisis could lead to compulsory licences (Managing… [read post]