Search for: "Works v. State" Results 2741 - 2760 of 61,617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2011, 6:08 am
 The study actually states that 47 percent of those surveyed had no opinion as to whether they preferred to work for male or female partners or associates. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:08 am
 The study actually states that 47 percent of those surveyed had no opinion as to whether they preferred to work for male or female partners or associates. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 7:00 pm
In an opinion that brings labor laws in a dozen states into question, the Supreme Court ruled on June 19 in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:00 am
Zalewska v Department for Social Development (Child Poverty Action Group and another intervening) [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] WLR (D); [2008] WLR (D) 356 “The United Kingdom's decision to restrict the payment of welfare benefits for nationals of Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic (known collectively as the ‘A8 states’) to those who had worked an uninterrupted 12 months in employment… [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
  Draegen is a co- founder of the company, its chief executive officer (CEO) and majority shareholder, and resides and works in North Carolina. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
With the new procedures in place I intend to devote my energies to making them work in order to achieve that objective. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Workers’ Compensation held the exclusive remedy available to an employee injured on the way to a work-related meetingSulecki v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 04706, Decided on June 3, 2010, Appellate Division, First DepartmentRobert Sulecki, an engineer employed by the New York City Department of Design and Construction, was injured after tripping on a sidewalk adjoining a City-owned building while on his way to a work-related meeting. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:14 am
Changing the scheduled number of hours that employees are to work during the workweekMitchell v LaBarge, 257 AD2d 834Ann M. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm by Jeanne Charn
A simple approach is state provided counsel for all parties but this would impose on states costs of assistance for many who are well above typical legal aid guidelines (125% of poverty). [read post]