Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 14,912
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands… [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:43 am
For example, I had an elderly man (and now some people think that I am an elderly man — ouch!) [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 2:13 pm
In Zhang v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 6:52 am
From Tahoe to Carson, Indigenous people say Sierra names misrepresent them [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:22 am
” On this basis, and for various other reasons, the Court of Appeal concluded that the Claimant was not “likely” to obtain a final injunction at trial in accordance with the test set out in section 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (“HRA”) and the judgment of Lord Nicholls in Cream Holdings v Banerjee ([2005] 1 AC 253), and therefore lifted the injunction that it had previously granted. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 pm
I suspect they will be preoccupying quite a few people for a while. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:22 am
Rev. 355The Extradition Clause and Indian Country– Grant Christensen [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 1:22 pm
Mendoza v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 4:43 am
Last week’s Ninth Circuit case of Facebook v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Noting the decision of the Court of Appeals in People v Ribowsky, 77 NY2d 284, the Appellate Division observed that "[a] defendant has the right at common law and under the State Constitution to be tried in the county where the crime was committed unless the Legislature has provided otherwise". [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 12:38 pm
In Bilac v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm
The trial court granted Travelers’ motion for summary judgment, but Division One reversed the trial court’s ruling. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:59 pm
The Court of Appeals, in People v Clermont (2013 NY Slip Op 06806 [10/22/13]) the defense suppression motion said defendant had been stopped due to an MVA when no car was involved. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Noting the decision of the Court of Appeals in People v Ribowsky, 77 NY2d 284, the Appellate Division observed that "[a] defendant has the right at common law and under the State Constitution to be tried in the county where the crime was committed unless the Legislature has provided otherwise". [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 4:15 pm
In Shafer v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 7:23 am
The law created eight-foot buffer zones that surrounded people going into or out of abortion clinics. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:06 am
Other cases granted today include: Guerrero-Lasprilla v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:57 pm
Still, we were dismayed last week to see so many Supreme Court Justices during oral arguments apparently willing to let the federal government take over an area of law governing criminals that the Constitution grants to the states.The question in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 12:33 pm
From Richwine v. [read post]
