Search for: "THOMAS v. US GOVERNMENT" Results 2761 - 2780 of 5,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
” At Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter discusses the invitation brief filed by the Solicitor General recently in Kimble v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This would help ensure that more robust reserves will be available in the event an economic downturn or catastrophic event merits their use. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This would help ensure that more robust reserves will be available in the event an economic downturn or catastrophic event merits their use. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:30 am by Máiréad Enright
Neither is the court entitled to dispute the correctness of a particular religious belief, though it may ask whether it is sincerely held (Thomas v Review Board). [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:38 pm by Amy Howe
Almost all of the 215 felony indictments under that law, she observed, involved the use or creation of fake government IDs. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost looks at Justice Clarence Thomas’ solo concurrence in last week’s Fourth Amendment case, Collins v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post   That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International… [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Nelson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, dissented from denial of certiorari in Garco, writing that it “would have been an ideal case to reconsider” Auer deference, which he said “frustrates the notice and predictability purposes of rulemaking, and promotes arbitrary government. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Finally, note that the government may generally insist that, when it hires people to communicate a government message, those people use that government money only for the government-selected speech (see Rust v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:22 am
Awad’s scheme involved the use of a billing company operated by his co-defendant, Herman Thomas. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 8:51 am by Peter Margulies, Ira Rubinstein
The July 2020 decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]