Search for: "Andrew Koppelman"
Results 261 - 280
of 333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am
Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Healthcare Reform (Oxford University Press, March 2013) Chief Justice John Roberts stunned the nation by upholding the Affordable Care Act–more commonly known as Obamacare. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:29 am
(Cross-posted from Human Rights at Home blog, here)I suppose we are meant to be grateful for the Court’s opinion recognizing that discrimination against gay, lesbian and trangender people is sex discrimination under Title VII, as Andrew Koppelman explained a generation ago and discusses in a July 10th post here. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Thomas Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2019).Andrew M. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
I will conclude this series of posts by considering the variants of MFN that affect the way strict scrutiny is applied. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Eugene has kindly invited me to contribute a series of posts, briefly describing my taxonomy of new variants of the most-favored-nation theory of religious liberty (forthcoming in the Iowa Law Review). [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
The present doctrinal development begins with Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Let's move on to other variants. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Here I will consider how the MFN theory was expanded to its present bloated proportions. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:40 am
" I expect to have a draft of the article up at SSRN soon.]Update: My colleague-in-blogging, Andrew Koppelman attributes to me the view that "the Constitution is violated whenever Congress does anything unprecedented. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:04 am
” Lastly, Andrew Koppelman of Salon considers Scalia through the lens of the tragic figure Othello and “with deep regret” concludes, “Oh, what a noble mind is here o’erthrown” (N.B., the line is from Hamlet, not Othello). [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 9:40 pm
To quote the abstract of the article,In the past few years, a number of influential constitutional scholars such as Jack Balkin, Robert Cooter, Andrew Koppelman, Neil Siegel and others have called for doing away with the traditional principle of judicially limited enumerated power and replacing it with the principle declared in Resolution VI of the Virginia Plan originally introduced in the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 7:10 am
Kent Greenawalt, Andrew Koppelman, Northwestern University School of Law & Bernadette A. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 1:33 am
Feb 20, 2007) (NO. 271, 2882/01)Robert Koppelman, New York, for appellant. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 10:05 am
J. 1236 (2010) (co-authored with Alice Ristroph)(presented by Cary Franklin)• Moderator and Commentator: Angela Littwin, University of TexasPanel Six11:00-12:30Religious Equality• Andrew Koppelman, Northwestern— Religious Neutrality in American Law: An Analysis and Defense (Harvard University Press, forthcoming 2012)(presented by Lawrence Sager)• Doug Laycock, University of Virginia—Commentator• Lawrence Sager, University of… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:01 am
Writing for Salon, Andrew Koppelman sums up the decision: “What is really at war here is different conceptions of individual liberty. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:12 am
He quotes Andrew Koppelman of Northwestern Law School, who posits that arguments in favor of gay marriage "will have trouble attracting votes from the current justices. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:41 am
” For further reading about the interracial marriage precedents (and others), see Andrew Koppelman’s excellent book, Same Sex, Different States (the only e-book I’ve ever purchased!). [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:05 am
” The Northwestern University Law Review Online hosts a podcast in which Andrew Koppelman and Steven Calabresi discuss the legal legacy of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, eds., Foundation Press 2011).From SmartCILP:William N. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:52 am
As Andrew Koppelman has observed, even a “facially neutral law may nonetheless violate equal protection if the disparate impact reflects a purpose to discriminate. [read post]
