Search for: "CWA"
Results 261 - 280
of 923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2008, 10:52 am
For the text of the decision follow this link to The Guard Publishing Company d/b/a The Register-Guard and Eugene Newspaper Guild, CWA Local 37194. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:15 pm
by Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team Making good on a promise to redefine the Clean Water Act (CWA) term, “Waters of the United States” or WOTUS, on January 18, 2023, the latest revised definition of “Waters of the United States” was published in the Federal Register by the U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:29 pm
Under the CWA alone, gross negligence penaltes based upon a discharge rate of 19,000 barrels per day would total to $57 Million Per Day. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 10:00 pm
Provisions contained within the CAA and CWA are considered to be technology based and have arguably helped drive innovation. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 5:05 pm
The case relates to the State of New York’s permitting authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
The Sackett case involved an EPA compliance order under the CWA involving consequences that were so serious and final as to warrant pre-enforcement judicial review. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:03 am
§ 1369, and may instead challenge the validity of the rule in a citizen suit to enforce the CWA? [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
402(b) of the CWA, it follows that a transfer of . . . permitting authority does not trigger ? [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
This review could result in reversing the prior determination that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA’s) technology-based effluent limits do not apply. [read post]
30 May 2023, 7:01 am
Those 15 pages ostensibly cover the structure and history of the Clean Water Act (CWA), but that background information is neatly interwoven with a narrative of the “crushing consequences even for inadvertent violations” that property owners are subjected to under the Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
This review could result in reversing the prior determination that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA’s) technology-based effluent limits do not apply. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
This review could result in reversing the prior determination that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA’s) technology-based effluent limits do not apply. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:01 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (together, the “Agencies”) published a final rule in the Federal Register redefining the term “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”) under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
This review could result in reversing the prior determination that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA’s) technology-based effluent limits do not apply. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
This review could result in reversing the prior determination that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA’s) technology-based effluent limits do not apply. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 1:58 pm
Debates over the reach of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) have been ongoing for decades. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 11:48 am
On August 8, 2019, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) published a set of proposed amendments (the “Proposed Rule”) to the regulations governing the issuance of Water Quality Certifications by states pursuant to Section 401 (“Section 401 Water Quality Certification”) of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:00 pm
This review could result in reversing the prior determination that the Clean Water Act’s (CWA’s) technology-based effluent limits do not apply. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:54 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) (together, the “Agencies”) announced a final rule (the “Repeal Rule”) rescinding the 2015 Clean Water Rule (the “2015 Rule”) that defined “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”) under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:57 pm
Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) approval of temperature increases for over a dozen water bodies in Oregon under the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). [read post]