Search for: "California v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 12,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 6:51 pm by admin
In a 2-1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a California voter initiative [Proposition 8] stripping same sex couples of the right to marry is unconstitutional. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 10:17 am by Barhoma Law
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case that could have broad implications for juveniles who are serving life sentences for a California murder conviction. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:04 am by WIMS
Petitioners, a contingent of environmental and community groups, bring serious challenges to the State of California's plans to improve air quality in the San Joaquin Valley, an area with some of the worst air quality in the United States -- i.e. whether U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:37 am by Kali Borkoski
The transcript in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:54 pm by Dwight Sullivan
”  [9th Circuit order here]  Accordingly, the appeal will now proceed of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California’s 3 August 2011 ruling allowing portions of Carolyn Martin’s suit against NCIS and other officials at MCRD San Diego to proceed. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:01 pm
James Otero of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an opinion granting summary judgment for the defendant in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
Proc., § 410.10) authorizes California courts to exercise jurisdiction on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of California. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm by Kali Borkoski
United States is here, and the transcript from Abramski v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:19 am
 So, the California Supreme Court just issued the following order:In light of the United States Supreme Court's order vacating our judgment in the above-entitled case and remanding the cause to this court "for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC. v. [read post]