Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen" Results 261 - 280 of 1,809
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Ashley Deeks
Nor does it possess a database containing every citizen’s photograph. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am by Graham Smith
The Canadian Supreme Court decision in Equustek and the French Conseil d'Etat decision to make a CJEU reference in Google v CNIL have once again focused attention on the intractable issues around cross-border liability for publication on the internet. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:40 am by Graham Smith
The Canadian Supreme Court decision in Equustek and the French Conseil d'Etat decision to make a CJEU reference in Google v CNIL have once again focused attention on the intractable issues around cross-border liability for publication on the internet. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 2:17 pm by Eric Goldman
Indeed, the First Amendment precludes a domestic government from exercising comparable control over a social media company in the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:26 pm by Thomas James
By Thomas James, Minnesota attorney In Fourth Estate Public Benefits Corp. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:45 pm
The Supreme Court made that clear when it recognized, in a landmark 1982 decision called NAACP v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by Hayley Evans
-Saudi citizen, without his consent, from U.S. military custody in Iraq to Saudi custody in Saudi Arabia, in his Doe v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
One company does the market research and the other follows. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:35 am by CMC
It does not directly regulate speech. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Public Citizen's Deepak Gupta represented consumers seeking to pursue a class action against AT&T despite an arbitration clause in their cell phone contracts purporting to bar all class actions. [read post]