Search for: "Crews v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2016, 6:58 am by Jack Kennedy
Turning to the Enterprise Act, s.22(1) states that the CMA must refer arrangements or transactions where “(a) a relevant merger situation has been created; and (b) the creation of that situation has resulted, or may be expected to result, in a substantial lessening of competition within any market or markets in the United Kingdom for goods or services. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:22 pm by Joseph Stacey
The punitive damages claim was based on the precedent setting 2009 Supreme Court of the United States ruling in Atlantic Sounding v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:24 am
Background Our law firm represents a United States credentialed merchant mariner who was the nominal employee of a security services company named American Guard Services. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:23 am by The Erlich Law Office, PLLC
v=etXYIozoACw   The United States Supreme Court’s Decision on Non-exempt Employee’s Work Day This past Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Sundara Rajan, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Glasgow, depicts a fascinating drama in which the principal actors are two literary ladies and, making a relatively rare appearance centre stage, the United States Postal Service. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm by Viking
TheRepulic reports on United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:31 pm by Jon
United States handed down by the United States Supreme Court June 16, 2011, may open federal courts to individuals to challenge federal statutes, such those against drugs, as unconstitutional infringements on individuals' rights and usurpations of Federal Power in realms reserved to the States under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit determined that the casino was only “theoretically” capable of maritime transport because it is: indefinitely moored to the land by lines tied to steel pilings. [read post]