Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 261 - 280 of 360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2015, 7:55 am
" Eric Segall has this post today at "Dorf on Law. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 5:14 am by Amy Howe
” In an essay for the Wake Forest Law Review, Eric Segall looks at the jurisprudence of Justice Antonin Scalia and argues that his “rejection of judicially created rights and limitations that do not have strong textual or historical support is a narrative that should not . . . hold up over time. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:36 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Rothermel of Venable on the firm’s blog, All About Advertising Law Best Practices for Employers Hosting Halloween Office Parties – Philadelphia lawyer Eric Greco of Obermayer on the firm’s blog, HR Legalist To Follow or Not To Follow … (Social Media in the Workplace—Part 1 of 2) -Los Angeles lawyer Elizabeth Levy of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s California Peculiarities Employment Law When Opposing Counsel Tries to Bully You… [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:04 pm by Amy Howe
” At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall summarizes a recent panel on transparency at the Court, explaining that it focused primarily on “the lack of cameras at the Supreme Court but also the Justices’ anonymous votes on granting or denying certiorari, the Court’s recusal practices (or lack thereof), and the lack of rules concerning their taxpayer-funded papers. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:13 am
[Before I turn to those remarks, however, I do want to respond to a passing remark that Professor Eric Segall reported in his Dorf on Law post yesterday. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm by Andrew Hamm
Segall at ACS Law, Carrie Severino at National Review, Timothy G. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 8:22 am
"A Judge's Judge": Today at "Dorf on Law," law professor Eric Segall has a post that begins, "The 27th floor view of the sun glistening off Lake Michigan is simply stunning. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
”  And in The Atlantic, Eric Segall argues that the case is “a political challenge to the ACA dressed up in legal garb. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
” At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall discusses the “running debate among legal scholars and Court commentators over the blend of personal values and law that drives Supreme Court decisions. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:46 pm by Colin O'Keefe
The Ethical Case for Neutral Third Party Investigators - Corporate investigator Philip Segal of Charles Griffin Intelligence on their blog, The Ethical Investigator If You Don’t Look for Water Contamination, You Won’t Find It. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:45 am
That argument in fact came up in an important question posed by Chief Justice Roberts to John Bursch, counsel for the states defending their laws banning same-sex marriage (kudos to legal scholar Eric Segall for correctly predicting that the Chief Justice would be the one to raise this issue): Counsel, I’m not sure it’s necessary to get into sexual orientation to resolve the case. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary on the cases and oral arguments come from Noah Feldman for Bloomberg View, Marci Hamilton at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, David Gans at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Eric Segall at ACSblog, John Culhane at Politico Magazine, Bob Tuttle and Ira Lupu at Cornerstone, Adam Winkler at ACSblog, Joseph Mansilla at Adventures in Doctrinal Wonderland, David Upham at The Public Discourse, Karl Laird at Oxford Human Rights Hub,… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am by Amy Howe
In a podcast at Slate, Adam Liptak and Eric Segall discuss whether “the justices are just as motivated by political and psychological concerns as they are by legal doctrine and case law” with Dahlia Lithwick. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 7:25 pm
" Slate today has posted online the new installment of its "Amicus" podcast featuring Dahlia Lithwick, with guests Eric Segall and Adam Liptak. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:15 pm
"On Judicial Candor, Judge Posner, and the Supreme Court": Eric Segall had this blog post yesterday at "Dorf on Law. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
by Eric SegallI was recently asked to guest teach a class at Michigan State Law School on the topic of the appropriate judicial role and whether the Supreme Court is or is not a real court (I argue in my book the Court is not a real court). [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:39 am by Amy Howe
  At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall suggests a hypothetical that, in his view, proves that the government should prevail, while at JURIST Timothy Jost discusses the possible effect of the decision on Medicaid and CHIP, a program that provides health insurance to uninsured children. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:55 pm
" And today at "Dorf on Law," Eric Segall has a post titled "Text All The Way Down: Why the Government Should Prevail in King v. [read post]