Search for: "Eugene Scalia"
Results 261 - 280
of 368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
President Trump announced his intention to nominate Eugene Scalia, the son of the late U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:20 pm
She is seated in the front row, between Justice Elena Kagan and Scalia’s son Eugene. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
It was none other than Eugene Volokh . . . . [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
The list included Eugene Volokh, Ilya Somin, Jonathan Adler, Mike Dorf, Pam Karlan, and Mark Tushnet, among many others. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Lawyers who had worked in the Reagan Justice Department, typically former clerks of Justice Scalia, invented its legal foundations. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
A post at PrawfsBlawg reflects on Justices Breyer and Scalia's recent visit to the University of Arizona's Rogers College of Law, where they engaged in debate over statutory and constitutional interpretation. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 2:17 am
Justice Scalia interjected that he "would have thought [section 360's] primary purpose would be to spare individuals the necessity of supporting causes that they don't support. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
There's long been a dispute about whether religious freedom provisions limit the government's power related to religious sites on government land. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:47 pm
Justice Scalia, in dissent, described Brand X as a "breathtaking novelty: judicial decisions subject to reversal by executive officers. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 8:06 am
Scholars have suggested that such concerns can be addressed in specific cases and exceptionally, only "where anonymity is needed to avoid 'threats, harassment, or reprisals,'" as Justice Scalia argued in McIntyre, a landmark case on the topic. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 5:11 am
In this post, I'm continuing my series on "Freedom for the Press as an Industry, or for the Press as a Technology? [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Clanton eventually enrolled in the Antonin Scalia Law School (formerly George Mason), and recently was hired by Judge Pryor as a law clerk upon graduation. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
They deliberately became the avatars of the permanent or (as Justice Scalia liked to say) “dead” Constitution, insisting on a strong dividing line between interpretation and amendment. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:54 am
As Justice Scalia commented in Gore, acidly but not inaccurately: "One might understand the Court's eagerness to enter this field, rather than leave it with the state legislatures, if it had something useful to say. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:21 pm
Or perhaps they might conclude that even facially content-neutral injunctions are content-based when they target an identified set of protesters (as Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas argued in Madsen). [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:40 am
” At The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh discusses an amicus brief filed in a First Amendment student rap case, while at The Conversation Clay Calvert urges the Court to grant review in the case, arguing that “public school students deserve the right to know, pre-posting and pre-texting, what their First Amendment rights are when they are away from campus. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:50 pm
Eugene Volokh briefly reviews past ABA ratings for Souter (“well qualified”), Thomas (“qualified”), and Roberts (‘well qualified”) At the WSJ Law Blog, Ashby Jones turns to the question of a possible successor to Kagan in the SG’s office. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:33 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Professor Eugene Volokh noted the unusual composition of the dissent -- Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan and Scalia. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:30 pm
” Leading the court challenge are Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partners Eugene Scalia and Daniel Davis, who last year successfully represented the Chamber and the Business Roundtable in striking down an SEC rule on proxy access in part for failing to properly consider costs and benefits. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:22 am
Heck, as Eugene Volokh points out, the Court hasn't even cleared up whether the right is truly fundamental, and whether limitations are subject to strict or intermediate scrutiny. [read post]