Search for: "INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 12 v. STATE" Results 261 - 280 of 581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Court rejected the idea that the fetus is a person with independent constitutional rights. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:46 am
When parents and school districts disagree and cannot resolve their differences, they often end up in a due process hearing. [read post]
Among its many demands, the complaint, which was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, asked the court to order the drainage districts to cease "all discharges of nitrate that are not authorized by an NPDES or state operating permit. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
He was even born in Washington, where his mother was a public-school teacher, on February 12, 1965. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
Petitioners’ reply   United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
” Finally, though we think of the case as more of a “released hold” than a relist, the Court has scheduled Elmbrook School District v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:39 am by Roger Parloff
In other words, it was drafted and enacted precisely to deal with the situation that has arisen in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm by Guest Author
The Court has turned away each such challenge (most recently in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Oregon, which basically eviscerated the Free Exercise Clause as an independent source of constitutional rights. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
At issue was whether the district court erred in using the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On 12 February 2015, there will be an application in the case of Decker v Hopcraft. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Citing Baker v Poughkeepsie City School District, 18 NY3d 714, the court said that “[a]lthough a particular individual's involvement or participation in the disciplinary process does not automatically compel his or her recusal, the case law makes clear that "individuals who are personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process should disqualify themselves from reviewing the recommendations of a Hearing Officer and from acting on the… [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
Hurles 12-1472Issue: Whether, under the Antiterrorism and Effective [read post]