Search for: "In Re U.S. Grand Jury Subpoena" Results 261 - 280 of 392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2009, 12:46 am
Visit Legal Technology Ensuring Coverage for Actions in Response to Investigations New York Law Journal Receiving a subpoena or a federal grand jury "target letter" is likely to prompt a company to ask many questions, not the least of which is: "Does our insurance cover this? [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:02 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Natalie K. Orpett
Likewise, the legal requirements of grand jury secrecy likely prohibit the department making public a great deal of the information that Americans might crave about the ongoing investigation. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:16 pm
Here, the senator cited the example of the employees in the case, In re Grand Jury Subpoena: Under Seal, 415 F.3d 333 (4th Cir. 2005), who were confused about confidentiality because the company's counsel told them, "We can represent you as long as no conflict appears. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 9:21 am
Among the powers agents now have for an assessment: • Conduct surveillance without an otherwise required court order • Obtain grand jury subpoenas for personal telephone and e-mail accounts • Recruit informants for feeding information about a group or person to the bureau • Examine records… [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:55 am by Ryan Singel
JSTOR doesn’t go quite as far in its statement on the prosecution — though there are clear hints that they were not the ones who wanted a prosecution, and that they were subpoenaed to testify at the grand jury hearing by the federal government. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
In November 2006, Lane testified before a federal grand jury about his reasons for firing Schmitz…. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:54 am
Temkin, principals in Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, write that there is no question that in certain situations, such as receipt of a grand jury subpoena, IRS summons or court order, an accountant is compelled to disclose client information. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 5:55 am by Albert W. Alschuler
A federal grand jury convened by the Justice Department should investigate Trump’s conduct as well. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:15 pm by justinsilverman
Id. at 1414, citing In re Grand Jury Investigation, 399 F.3d 527 (2d Cir. 2005); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F3d 910 (8th Cir. 1997); In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263, (D.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:06 pm by Jackie McDermott
The Court held that Noris Babb could establish that her employer, the U.S. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:28 am by Emma Snell
“They’re throwing everything against us,” said a 22-year-old Ukrainian soldier who said Russians were fighting with artillery, tanks, helicopters and mortars. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:34 am
As Weld’s investigation unfolded, lawyers for various potential witnesses and targets would get together for weekly meetings to compare notes, discuss what we believed subpoenaed witnesses were saying to federal agents or to the grand jury, and determine what it all portended for our clients. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:41 am by Emma Snell
Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is aiming to quash a subpoena for his testimony before a special grand jury investigating Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:53 am by Norman L. Eisen
A grand jury in Manhattan indicted him for this conduct on March 30, 2023, charging him with 34 felony counts of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:22 am by Susan Brenner
On April 6, 2011, a federal grand jury indicted Sawyer “on one count of receipt and distribution of images of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:55 am by Stephen Gillers
It convened a grand jury, which subpoenaed records related to the law firm’s work. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:22 am by Ron Coleman
But when the Jihadis walked right through “law enforcement” and blew up downtown that bright fall day, they blew up much of what the remained debatable in the debate about privacy and technology — or, at least, so it seemed, until a year ago, when the 11th Circuit issued an important ruling in  In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, summarized here by Joel Hruska: [A] John Doe . . . was compelled to testify before a… [read post]