Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 261 - 280 of 5,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2017, 8:33 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
  I will provide links to reports and analysis on court and other legal matters on Wechat. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 8:16 pm by Dennis Crouch
Aug. 10, 2022) (applying recapture to amendments to overcome eligibility rejections). [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:56 pm
Moreover, the amendment should have been permitted under Rule 28(1) of the Uniform Rules of Court, which allow parties to amend their pleadings unless good cause is shown to the contrary. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 11:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Apr. 10, 2014)The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Kind leave to amend its counterclaims to add a Lanham Act false advertising claim. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 2:22 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
June 20, 2024) ruled unlawful and invalidated the portion of this rule that provides that HIPAA obligations are triggered in “circumstances where an online technology connects (1) an individual’s IP address with (2) a visit to a[n] [unauthenticated public webpage] addressing specific health conditions or healthcare providers. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 6:01 am by Philip R. Stein and Enza G. Boderone
(“LBHI”) filed two new motions in its ongoing Southern District of New York Bankruptcy Court litigation against approximately 130 loan originators and brokers: (1) an Omnibus Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaints Pursuant to Rule 7015 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (“Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint”); and (2) a Motion for Leave to Amend and Extend the Scope of the Alternative Dispute… [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm by WIMS
It is expected that consideration of rules revisions will be an early matter for consideration when Senators reconvene. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:01 am
While the amendment technically eliminated the provision requiring companies to contractually ensure third party compliance, nevertheless contractual requirements, including new reps and warrantees, will as a matter of sound practice be needed by January 1, 2010. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 1:53 pm
., decided 10/2/2009) In what may be the Fourth Department's first decision addressing what constitutes a plaintiff's prima facie showing in a no-fault action, the appellate court ruled that plaintiff MRI facility made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence that the prescribed statutory billing forms were received by defendant and that defendant's payment of no-fault benefits to plaintiff was… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 9:36 am
Below is the request for rulemaking to eliminate the "evergreen" requirement in amended Rule 144(i). [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:14 am
Evans, 514 U.S. 1, 12-14 (1995), the Supreme Court noted that the exclusionary rule does not apply to every violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:37 am by Andrew Perlman
   [1] ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof’l Responsibility, Formal Op. 10-457 (2010) [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:12 pm by SarahSwank
The rule went into effect on January 10, 2012 and health plans covered by HIPAA must comply by January 1, 2014. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:48 pm by Sophia Tang
The amendment does not address some matters that remain unclear in Chinese law. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:41 am
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES THIS COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO RULE ON DEFENDANTS' DEMURRERS TO CAUSES OF ACTION ONE AND EIGHT All Defendants in this action filed Demurrers to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (SAC). [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:32 am by David Urban
  The companies, on the other hand, have argued as a threshold matter that because they are private entities, they are not subject to the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:00 am by Ken Monington
Microsoft sought exclusion of the proposal from its proxy materials under subsection (i)(10) of Rule 14a-8. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:56 am by Unknown
Both developments can result in the commingling of registered and unregistered shares that can make it difficult for a shareholder to trace their shares to a registration statement, a requirement to have standing under Securities Act Section 11.According to the professors, the Commission should amend Rule 144 to provide that, when a registration statement becomes effective, the applicable holding periods should be reset to the later of either: (1) 90 days or (2) the filing… [read post]
19 May 2020, 2:54 pm by Matthew Guariglia
The German government now has until the end of 2021 to amend the BND Act to make it compliant with the court’s ruling. [read post]