Search for: "Jackson v. District of Columbia"
Results 261 - 280
of 360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia denied a request for a preliminary injunction that would have prevented the rule from going into effect. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
Jackson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Rochow v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
District of Columbia, 20-331, involves D.C. and Maryland’s domestic emoluments clause challenge to Trump’s ownership interests in hotels and restaurants, and specifically the availability of the writ of mandamus to correct claimed errors. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:24 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization and their overturning of Roe v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Then there’s Jackson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
But constitutional textualists refuse to look at consequences and claim that text trumps precedent (see District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
When, in 2019, a reporter asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi whether Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin could be jailed for refusing the House’s request for six of President Trump’s tax returns, she replied: “Let me just say we do have a jail down in the basement of the Capitol. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:04 am
At issue in the case is a question left open after the justices’ 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
” Justice Eddins is referencing District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Two-time relist Jackson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected these claims on the ground that the Constitution’s speech-or-debate clause prohibits judicial review of legislative actions such as voting. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
It’s worth pausing to consider how that might work.At present, 32 states plus the District of Columbia have laws binding electors in some manner to vote for the state’s electoral vote winner. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:01 pm
Jackson replied. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
Canada The claimant’s defamation claim was struck out in Skyllar v The University of British Columbia 2022 BCSC 439. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court case Murray v. [read post]
