Search for: "Kerr v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 1,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2008, 10:59 am
Over on Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has posted a thoughtful and fair-minded response to our study of public interpretations of the Scott v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:41 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Today the Seventh Circuit handed down a fascinating set of opinions on the Fourth Amendment implications of long-term GPS monitoring: United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 6:09 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) A few weeks ago, at the Privacy Law Scholars Conference in Washington, DC, a group of privacy activists put on a panel about how to implement the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment from the two concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:36 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
  The fallacious assumptions underlying this argument are too numerous to unpack at this late hour, but at least two thoughts can start the job: first, New York v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Imagine a police officer sees a car speeding over 90 miles an hour. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am by JULIE BALL, TRAINEE, MATRIX CHAMBERS
On Monday and Tuesday, the 3 and 4 December 2018, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, and Lord Lloyd-Jones) will hear Privacy International’s appeal (UKSC 2018/0004) against the Court of Appeal’s decision in R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal ([2017] EWCA Civ 1868; [2018] 1 WLR 2572), which found that the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA 2000”), s 67(8)… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:33 am by Orin Kerr
As regular readers might recall, I filed a pro bono cert petition in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:34 am
Kerr, a George Washington University law professor in Washington, D.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:55 am by Darryl Hutcheson, Matrix
The majority contrasted the case at hand with ECHR cases such as Üner v Netherlands and X v Austria where the ECHR had considered the best interests of the child in determining the proportionality of an interference with parents’ rights under article 8 alone and article 8 combined with article 14. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The March 2012 issue of the William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal has an unusual article by Thomas Krattenmaker, Looking Back on Cohen v. [read post]