Search for: "L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION" Results 261 - 280 of 1,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2023, 2:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Such a claim  is commenced by one or more shareholders on behalf of and for the benefit of a corporation but  not commenced by the corporation itself. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:22 am by Aaron Morris
In the case, Lockheed Martin Corporation and L-3 Communications Integrated Systems are suing one another. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:54 am by Martin L. Stern
 Consisting of nearly 100 corporations, municipalities, and non-profit organizations, the initiative hopes to interconnect communities with advanced fiber networks in order to facilitate sharing of knowledge, skill, and applications in critical public service areas.An in-depth review of the US Ignite initiative and the opportunities it presents for communities, broadband providers, application developers, and other stakeholders will be provided in a live webcast… [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:58 pm by Sam E. Antar
An article entitled “Corporate Ethics and Sarbanes-Oxley” (article first appeared in Wall Street Lawyer – July 2003) by Frank Navran and Edward L. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:02 am by Larry Catá Backer
BraniginExecutive DirectorThe Global Corporate Community of Practice for Business & Human Rights Session One An Introduction to Human Rights Risk Management 8:00 – 8:45 a.m. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As in the first two groups of hypos, these in Part 3 are based upon “open door” encounters in my practice and expert witness work. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
These may be found in orienting documents and provisions--preambles, objectives mandates for special procedures, or in the organizing ideologies of the political community in which the project is to be undertaken. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:02 pm by and
The court relied on Upjohn to make three main points: (1) Upjohn did not hold or imply that outside counsel is a necessary predicate for the privilege to apply;[1] (2) communications made by non-attorneys serving as agents of attorneys, such as those individuals conducting interviews during an attorney-led internal investigation, are protected by the attorney-client privilege; and (3) Upjohn does not require companies to use “magic words” in employee interviews. [read post]