Search for: "Law v. United States Department of Agriculture"
Results 261 - 280
of 689
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
United States Department of Interior (Gaming - Tribal Service Area)Gibbs v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 6:10 am
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT, OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants., No. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
This paper presents a survey of federal and state court decisions on these two questions, hoping to offer some guidance to practitioners. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:21 am
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant., No. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:32 pm
And in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 6:29 am
Corruption swirled around the highest levels of the United States and of China. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 3:50 pm
United Farm Workers Nat'l Union, 442 U.S. 289, 298 (1979) (quoting Railway Mail Assn. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:25 am
CARVER COUNTY FARM SERVICE AGENCY & UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendants., No. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:29 pm
The Hobbs Act is a federal statute that vests “exclusive jurisdiction” with federal courts of appeal to determine the validity of rules and orders issued by the FCC, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Transportation, and other federal agencies. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in the case United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
Department of the Interior and has prior work experience with agricultural giant Monsanto. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 11:59 am
” United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 8:30 am
United States (Nuclear Sanctions Case), in which the Court unanimously approved “provisional measures” directing the United States to remove impediments on the export to Iran of medicine and medical devices, foodstuffs and agricultural commodities, and spare parts and equipment necessary for the safety of civil aviation. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am
Department of Commerce and the U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
” In other words, he thought Sure-Tan required the court to reconcile the NLRA and immigration law by excluding from NLRA coverage anyone who could not legally be hired in the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
., Professor of Law at William & Mary Law School. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
