Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 261 - 280
of 14,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2021, 4:30 am
The relationship between the applicant’s mark and the subject matter or purpose of the goods and services in question were therefore sufficiently direct to render the word mark descriptive of those goods and services, in spite of the fact that the relevant public did not know how the meditation was practised or what the method used exactly consisted of. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 2:54 pm
Mark it. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:15 am
how many days on average did it take us to conclude each matter? [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 10:10 am
Personally, I find it difficult to take a side in this matter. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 2:42 pm
Yes, service matters. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
See Mark A. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am
§ 1127) as follows:[T]he bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 2:05 am
For instance, readers might recall the bad luck of Cardi B’s trade mark application for the word mark “OKURRR” (see here). [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:45 am
Mandelman Matters Presents: ARE YOU READING THIS STUFF? [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 6:01 am
Mark Gold has a characteristically well-reasoned piece in The Art Newspaper as the AAMD's two-year experiment in allowing proceeds from art sales to finance “direct care” of their collections nears its close.The anti-deaccession view is presented as a matter of ethics, and, as Gold says, "unquestionably, preserving the objects entrusted to museums’ care is ethical. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Mark P. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 3:24 am
Doesn't seem as long-running as a pandemic-related lockdown, but we are getting there.] [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
Earlier this month, Advocate General (AG) Kokott handed down her Opinion in T-766/18 P, providing some indications regarding the distinctive character of collective and geographical collective trade marks and their interplay with geographical indications (GIs). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins gave the following brief remarks over the weekend in Chicago. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:19 am
Wouldn't that restriction exclude movies about certain lawyers? [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:26 pm
Or, you can email me at mark@blanelaw.com, or download any of my FREE Ebooks from this website. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
In this case, the federal Marks rule wouldn’t shed much light on the Texas Marks case — even if Texas courts had adopted that approach. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 8:11 am
District Court for the Middle District of Florida recommended approving that motion April 20, rejecting the argument that the matters aren’t substantially related. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 8:04 pm
The brief is certainly not the best ever filed, but it raises important points: Scandalous Marks: The Government incorrectly asserts that the Clause only prohibits registration of marks that contain “profanity, excretory or sexual” matter — despite the plain language of the text. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:04 pm
Stop using exclamation marks! [read post]
