Search for: "McDonald v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 1,458
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 2:21 pm by David Kopel
As they point out, the Text, History, and Tradition Test is the one used in Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 12:07 pm by Robert Laplaca
Manipoun violated the V Club Reward Program Rules which state that only the registered V Club member can gain entries from her own slot machine play, and whereas, Ms. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:50 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Proportionality and section 21 evictions Landlords will be pleased to learn that an appeal of the case McDonald v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 12:59 pm by Giles Peaker
We saw the case of McDonald v McDonald through the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
United States Surgical Corporation (1984) Simone Degeling and Greg Weeks13. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 11:14 am by Joe Price
For instance, the infamous “Hot Coffee” case (formally known as Liebeck v. [read post]