Search for: "McGuire v. McGuire"
Results 261 - 280
of 433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
”Analysis: In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows:“After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
11 May 2007, 1:23 am
FRIEDMAN, J.P., MARLOW, WILLIAMS, BUCKLEY, McGUIRE, JJ. *1 (Cite ... [read post]
25 May 2007, 1:13 am
Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Nardelli, McGuire, JJ. ... [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees before the completion of their required probationary period as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:30 am
Officer appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
*** In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
*** In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:30 am
Officer appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
McGuire was not exactly an opponent of gun control. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
., Corp. v Turner Constr. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:19 am
McGuire v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:35 pm
"SBC opposed the amendment, citing McGuire v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 3:42 am
Dorothy McGuire, on the other hand, is a plaintiff who does not fare well. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 6:59 am
City of Taylor, 412 F.3d 629, 650 (6th Cir.2005); McGuire v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
Here are some of the orders and pleadings from the Eaton v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:03 am
Trailer Leasing Co., 158 N.J. 561, 569 (1999); see McGuire v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court granted the appointing authority’s motion to dismiss Trainee’s petition and Trainee appealed.Sustaining the Supreme Court’s decision, the Appellate Division said that Trainee had no greater rights than those of probationary employees, and a probationary employee, consistent with the limitation set out by the Court of Appeals in York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, "may be discharged for any or no reason at all in the absence of a showing that [the]… [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:38 am
In June of 2015, in Glossip v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
