Search for: "Miller v. Superior Court"
Results 261 - 280
of 520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2007, 10:51 am
Clo White Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:27 pm
S. 557, 567 (1995) (expression under the First Amendment); Miller v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
Superior Court, addressing how to interpret the administrative exemption under California law. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
The unanimous decision by Lady Hale and Lord Reed, R (Miller) v Prime Minister, [2019] UKSC 41 (Miller (No 2)) breaks new and, in my view, shaky constitutional ground. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
Miller v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:35 am
Arcadians for Environmental Preservation v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:05 pm
In the Norfolk County Superior Court case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm
The California Supreme Court has been derelict in its duty to resolve state habeas petitions in a reasonable time by referring them to the superior court where they belong. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:23 am
The court responds: Nor does [the complaint] allege that the Gawker employees who allegedly posted comments did so within the scope of their employment, which is a required element of a respondeat superior claim in Illinois. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
Icon at Panorama, LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:51 am
In a closely watched case, a District of Columbia Superior Court judge today upheld the convictions of seven men charged in the 1984 murder of Catherine Fuller. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
Miller The Supreme Court has increasingly relied upon the concepts of professionalism and police training when regulating police conduct under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 7:48 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 11:07 am
Save North Petaluma River and Wetlands v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 9:03 am
State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:49 am
Superior Court Judges’ Benchbook: Trial in the Defendant’s Absence. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:22 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am
The court referenced State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Superior Court, Santa Clara, 74 Cal.App.4th 1008, 1012 (Cal. [read post]
