Search for: "Palmes v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 1,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  The West Palm Beach non-compete attorneys at the Mavrick Law Firm were recently confronted with this issue at trial and know that this would not be considered direct solicitation based on the Second District Court of Appeal’s holding in Lotenfoe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:02 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Attorneys fighting for victims of decades-old child sexual abuse, the March 2023 Third District Court of Appeals’ ruling in Doe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
Can the state tax you on the income you receive from activities conducted on your own reservation? [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 1:24 pm
That is because Article V, section 8 of the Florida Constitution  states in part that a Judge must be "a member of the Bar of Florida". [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:36 pm
  The difference of opinion relates to the Eleventh Circuit's opinion in Three Palms Pointe, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 3:22 pm by Aimee Czachorowski
Any newcomer to Delaware would note the proliferation of business names containing some variation on “Diamond State” or “Blue Rock” – and, as the Court of Chancery recently noted in its letter opinion in Diamond State Tire, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 12:21 pm
While there was some inculpatory evidence (the partial palm print, the stolen cell phones, Ford’s conversation with his girlfriend, and Ford’s Facebook post), no one saw the shooting. [read post]
4 May 2020, 8:29 am by Legal Help for Veterans
VA Secretary Robert Wilkie stated that “[v]eterans having access across the board to mobile and web health app services increases interoperability and eases the flow of information, while keeping their personal data secure. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:30 am by Jeremy Tyler
While the standards for expert witness testimony may differ between state and federal courts, all federal courts are bound by Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Daubert v. [read post]