Search for: "People v. Potter" Results 261 - 280 of 302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (IP finance)   Global - Patents Grasp for straws, drop the whole bundle: (Intellectual Property Directions) Made in China - A glimpse into the future of patent information: (Thomson Reuters Scientific) AIPPI Congress: USPTO, EPO, JPO directors speak on worldwide patent pendency: (Managing Intellectual Property) Eco-Patent Commons responds to critics: (Managing Intellectual Property) Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for broader claims: (Patently-O), Key patent strategies for nanotechnology… [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 10:00 am by Michael Grossman
When you take issue with a belief or position, one argument you can employ is called reductio ad absurdum, which sounds like a Harry Potter spell but is actually the Latin phrase “reducing to absurdity. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Young people’s engagement with Harry Potter shows how youth learn the skills of democracy by working through the culture around them. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  People don’t walk into a bookstore looking for Harry Potter & walk out with Hunger Games. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
Three people who had ties to the organizations were later convicted of federal crimes. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Shortly after taking office, he had an opportunity to do that, with Justice Potter Stewart’s announcement in June 1981 that he would retire in early July. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:16 am by Matthew Kahn
Writing for the majority, Justice Potter Stewart held that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places, and in his concurrence, Justice Harlan fleshed out a test for identifying a “reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am by Anthony Gaughan
 Four years later Potter Stewart took the same approach to the segregationist senators. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by David Kris
There are lots of young, fit, good-looking people playing volleyball or working out. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:41 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" wonders @ExtremeTech pjblack.me/x6czuC this is interesting: "Is Marriage Only For Rich People? [read post]