Search for: "People v Murray" Results 261 - 280 of 549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
This is an objective question, which should be formulated, according to Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481) at [35] as follows: “The question is what a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities would feel if she was placed in the same position as the claimant and faced with the same publicity” (Campbell v MGN at [99]). [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
On 1 July 2022, summary judgment was given in favour of the defendants in Haviland v Lownie [2022] EWHC 1688 (QB) by Murray J. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Clean Up the Internet has published its support of the UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport’s revised measures to protect people from anonymous trolls with the Online Safety Bill. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am by Emma Snell
Matt Murray reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm by Mark Walsh
” “And now the unbelievable outpouring of love and affection from people throughout the country because of what he symbolized to them,” Murray said. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard  22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack,&nb [read post]