Search for: "People v. Bear"
Results 261 - 280
of 5,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2021, 10:51 am
“… the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:22 am
In the case of Shehla Zia v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:16 am
V. 51, no. 6 (2001), pp. 48–53. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:35 pm
The case, Hart V. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:32 am
Briefly: At Reason.com, Damon Root responds to the argument by retired Justice John Paul Stevens, made in his new book, that the Second Amendment should be rewritten to provide that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the Militia shall not be infringed. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:13 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:48 pm
Photo Album: District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In its 6-3 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 4:41 am
But we're not so sure that her conviction for possession of a Taser would stand today.That's because three years ago, the Michigan Court of Appeals decided People v Yanna, which invalidated our state statute making possession of a Taser or stun gun illegal. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:40 am
Gates v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
Neither Sim v Stretch nor Jameel are directed to the issue and provide no clear support for the approach. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:00 pm
In Zemel v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 12:20 pm
In 1791—and for well more than a century afterward—legislatures disqualified categories of people from the right to bear arms only when they judged that doing so was necessary to protect the public safety.18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:59 am
Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma v. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 5:55 am
It’s just a question of what the evidence shows, and who bears the burden of proof. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:55 am
Case citation: Court of Master Sommeliers v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:14 am
People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:21 pm
The case, McDonald v. [read post]
