Search for: "People v. Branch"
Results 261 - 280
of 3,245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2018, 4:06 pm
EO-3 may also violate the First Amendment by discriminating on the basis of religion, but our amici argue that Hawaii v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
Witness Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
The NAB v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
" This principle, "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government, requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:05 am
The individual claiming exempt volunteer firefighter status has the burden of demonstrating that he or she enjoys such status [see People v Hayes, 135 AD 19]; and2. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
The Swiss branch of the Movement itself was lawfully registered in Switzerland. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:49 pm
One of the many ways EFF is fighting illegal NSA spying is in our lawsuit First Unitarian Church v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
The notion that the judiciary may supervise the political decisions of the two other branches was rejected as early as Chief Justice John Marshall’s landmark decision in Marbury v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:50 pm
Carroll v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am
” Schiff surmised that it was fair to conclude that it involves the president, or people around the president or both. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:57 pm
If one branch unconstitutionally aggrandizes itself, it is at the expense of one of the other branches. . . . [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 1:50 am
I would rather judges apply the law as they see it and save the sound bites for the elected branches. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:46 pm
The snow-drizzle may have slowed down the first two branches of government and every nonprofit in town on Monday morning, but the judiciary didn’t budge much: oral argument this morning in the appeal of Hatim v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
Here is the abstract: In McDonald v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:39 am
This case is a victory for people needing to sue an insurance company and its adjusters. [read post]
