Search for: "People v. Dunn" Results 261 - 280 of 355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the space below, I discuss another effort, albeit this time via the judiciary rather than the legislature, to prevent the people from formally weighing in on another hot-button issue: campaign finance reform. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:40 pm by Kedar
He worked in private practice at Gibson Dunn before becoming a federal judge. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
: Urooj Ahmad v Maya Appliances (IP Frontline)   Ireland Commercial Court makes first Community designs ruling: Karen Millen Ltd v Dunnes Stores (International Law Office)   Israel Boy from package of Israeli chocolate drink sues Elite for 5 million NIS (The IP Factor)   Kenya Court of Appeal declines to set aside High Court order restraining Delta Connections from using DELTA (Afro-IP)   South Africa South African Revenue Services loses… [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:11 am by SHG
., attorney in private practice (Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP); Hon. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As the Supreme Court observed in the context of high school students in Tinker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As Counsel notes, the evident intent of the subdivision (c) is to ‘protect the people’s initiative powers by precluding the Legislature from undoing what the people have done, without the electorate’s consent. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
By now most Verdict readers have probably heard about Justice Scalia’s provocative comments at last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Many commentators, including members of Congress and presidents, criticize judicial rulings as being influenced by improper philosophies or even by improper desires to protect partisan interests—think, for example, about the criticism of the conservative majorities in Bush v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
– ‘Deb was enduring every parents’ worst possible nightmare’ and ‘Deb was “destroyed by grief”’ are some of the quotes extracted from a ‘family source’, one Jacqui Dunn, unrelated to the family, as it happens. [read post]