Search for: "People v. Madison"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
In Weintraub v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
It will affect a large amount of people, rich, poor, young, or old. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am
NAACP and McAleenan v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:42 am
Madison in 1803 that[i]t is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:58 am
And, of course, the worst single feature of that Constitution is not even the Senate, but Article V, which, by basically making it impossible to amend the Constitution with regard to anything significant, creates an overwhelming incentive for smart people like Friedman to prattle on at his Georgetown and Silicon Valley and Davos dinner parties about the need for "better" and "more virtuous" people to take over our political system without ever, for even… [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
Not unexpectedly, James Madison, the primary architect of the Amendment, is caught in the middle. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
MADISON: THE POLITICAL TURNS PERSONAL AND THE PERSONAL TURNS POLITICALMost academics view much of Marbury v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
These letters clearly prove that Madison played a leading role in drafting the Virginia Plan. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:08 am
In Carson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
For many years in the 90s, Nancy and I would join Harry and Phyllis and another couple for the Bears v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:45 am
Mainly I just want there to be a Supreme Court case one day called Zopittybop-Bop-Bop v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:27 am
Madison -- a sound precedent if ever there were one. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:40 am
Madison Metro. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court cases, Reagan v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 2:34 pm
LSAT v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:17 am
[Tangential note: I owe this argument entirely, as alert readers will note, to Hamilton and Madison, in the Federalist. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
Along with Van Cleve, I also assigned Federalist 40, written by Madison, in which Madison defends, plausibly or not, the extraordinarily powers seized by the Framers in Philadelphia when measured against both the rather limited mandate of Congress--to suggest "revisions" in the Articles of Confederation--and, more importantly, the constraints of Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation, which required the assent of the legislatures of every one of the states… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:55 pm
Madison. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:48 am
In Watts v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
