Search for: "People v. Taylor" Results 261 - 280 of 980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am by Eric Goldman
But what makes social media platforms different is their ability to shape public discourse not by promoting their own messages but by silencing voices they deem to be harmful…. the bottleneck position that comes with control of these platforms brings with it a remarkable power to censor” By virtue of making publication decisions, every publisher necessarily “silences” the voices of people it chooses not to publish. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:02 am
Diana Taylor BRONX COUNTYCriminal Practice Accusatory Instrument Facially Insufficient; Fails To Establish Elements of Criminal Trespassing People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2024, 1:12 pm by John Floyd
More than half of the warrants targeted people of color, and half of the civilians killed were Black like Breonna Taylor. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
From April 2018 until June 2020, the defendant Marcus Stones (industry name “Mickey Taylor”) operated a performer account and fan page on the Just For Fans website. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 5:21 pm
Taylor, who previously served on the board, was re-nominated for a two-year term. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
’ Yet another, S.S., told Bell Rainey commented to her that he thought she had `”messed” with some nasty people’ and suggested that he otherwise would have, in S.S.'s words, `turn[ed][her] back “straight” from being “gay. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:57 am by Daniel Suhr
State Senator Lena Taylor objected that the bill “breaks down the wall of independence around independent agencies. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
James Taylor, respondent NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticeADA Assigned to Staff of Special Narcotics Part Authorized to Prosecute Non-Narcotic Offenses People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am by Rory Little
Significantly, Justice Scalia begins by noting that the Court ruled twenty-five years ago in Taylor v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
GuestKat Rosie Burbidge discusses Bhayani & Anor v Taylor Bracewell LLP, [2016] EWHC 3360, a summary judgment in which addressed the question of whether there was passing off due to the use of the plaintiff’s family name as part of the law firm’s name after she had left the partnership.PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 130 [week ending on Sunday 8 January] | Around the IP Blogs | Sunday Surprises | Trademark and co-branding as a badge of … did you… [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 9:59 am
  Herbert Wechsler, one of the greatest con law/fed courts professors of all time, apparently agonized over how Brown v. [read post]