Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 13,645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 10:22 am
United States as inconsistent with the Sixth Amendment as understood in Apprendi and its progeny. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:29 pm
Community Highlights & Recent News ● IACHR: United States Must Respect Peaceful Protest and Academic Freedom on Campuses. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:03 pm
In the 1969 case NLRB v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 1:24 pm
The United States Department of Labor (DOL) is charged with enforcing the requirements of ERISA. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:07 pm
The United States and the private plaintiffs filed an opposition. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:00 am
In AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
., filed a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:21 am
Blanford v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
VILER, Appellants, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
United States has come to an unceremonious end and all Americans should be concerned. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:46 am
United States that one cannot use the good-faith defense, especially when it’s based on an attorney’s counsel. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Union, Local 200 United, 19 NY3d 1009, 1011 [2012]; North Syracuse Cent. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Union, Local 200 United, 19 NY3d 1009, 1011 [2012]; North Syracuse Cent. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]