Search for: "Powers v. State Bar (1988)"
Results 261 - 280
of 351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 2:36 pm
In Samantar v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:02 am
"The Canadian patent expired in 1988. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 10:44 am
” Lloyd v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 2:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
”[1] Chair Lina Khan has previously voiced her support for doing so.[2] My view is that the Commission has no such rulemaking powers, and that the scope of the authority asserted would amount to an unconstitutional delegation of power by the Congress.[3] Others have written about those issues, and we can leave them for another day.[4] Professors Richard Pierce and Gus Hurwitz have each written that, if FTC rulemaking is to survive judicial scrutiny, it must apply to conduct… [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm
Chandresekhara Thevar, AIR 1948 PC 12 and (iii) Secy. of State for India v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am
The PRA states that “[t]he United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The bar is a low one and the background law is favorable to true federal officers but removal is by no means automatic and is often denied. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:15 am
See Exchange Act Release No. 25891 (July 7, 1988). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1973 SC 2701; and Ranjit Thakur v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
By contrast a judge, even one very experienced in intellectual property matters, does not have some special power of divination which leads instantly to an infallible conclusion, and no judge would claim to have such a power [though Lord Dilhorne must have come pretty close to doing so in his speech in Hensher v Restwawile]. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:17 pm
—Corpus Christi 1988, pet. ref’d). [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
First, in Estes v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:45 am
” Jones v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
The long-standing rule in this state bars the recovery of punitive damages when the tortfeasor dies before judgment. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:48 pm
Ruth V. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In 1969, in Tinker v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
§ 1983, alleging that they had assaulted and beaten him in a bar using nightsticks and fists. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:52 am
” (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
