Search for: "Price v. Chicago" Results 261 - 280 of 871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2006, 8:46 am
"Anticompetitive effects of the policy cited by the DOJ include (i) the suppression of technological innovation; (ii) the reduction of competition on price and quality; (iii) the restriction of efficient competition among brokers; (iv) an increased likelihood of express or tacit collusion; (v) raising barriers to entry; and (vi) denying brokers using new technologies and business models the same benefits of MLS membership available to competitors. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am by Alden Abbott
Supreme Court famously proclaimed American antitrust law to be a “consumer welfare prescription” in Reiter v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 7:30 am
Kolon case and how to use, or avoid, it in your trade secret case" – Griffith Price of Finnegan’s Washington, D.C. office; "Litigating Trade Secret Cases before the ITC – The future of TianRui Group v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 2:25 am
We also find that bankruptcy recoveries are higher in years when merger and acquisition activity is higher for reasons other than high stock prices. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Empire Today, LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm
For starters though, my colleague Patrick Spangler at Vedder Price in Chicago passed along a survey of some recent discovery rulings by the federal courts related to whether extra-administrative record discovery should be allowed in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling in MetLife v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:07 am by Steve McConnell
Last week we were at DRI-Chicago, which had some terrific panels. [read post]