Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 261 - 280
of 2,079
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
In short, I tend to agree with Schrems that the system might not be enough to soothe the Court of Justice. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:08 pm
Puerto Rico wants to find out what FBI agents are doing on its land, via a subpoena issued by the Puerto Rico Department of Justice. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:37 pm
The Court will take up that question next Term in No. 06-666, Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:59 am
In her concurring opinion in US v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:46 pm
The SpeechNow case has been a closely watched sequel to the Justices’ ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:00 pm
Importantly, petitioner addresses Justice Sutherland’s famed statement in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:49 am
Chief Justice Roberts announces opinion in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm
April sitting (April 17 to 26) California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:51 am
First, Nosal pushes forward the trend that began in 2013 when the Department of Justice announced that trade secret prosecutions would become an area of emphasis. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 6:11 pm
Oblak v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
The Department also has available to it a portion of certain fraud prevention and detection fees charged to applicants for H- and L- category visas. 8 U.S.C. 1356(v)(2)(A). [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Olson (1988) The question presented here is whether the public interest in proper administration of the laws (specifically, in agencies’ observance of a particular, statutorily prescribed procedure) can be converted into an individual right by a statute that denominates it as such, and that permits all citizens (or, for that matter, a subclass of citizens who suffer no distinctive concrete harm) to sue. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 am
Mount Holly Gardens Citizens in Action. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:42 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:17 pm
Justice Breyer summed up these fears by stating, "...if you win this case then there is nothing to prevent the police or the government from monitoring 24 hours a day the public movement of every citizen of the United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 9:05 pm
[Alfonso Lares v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:02 am
Renowned European sports psychologist takes Canucks, owner to court over dismissal during lockout Justice Department urges Maryland court to uphold citizens’ right to film police How 20 years has changed the debate over assisted suicide - Politics - CBC News Toronto senior one of 90 allegedly targeted by home renovation scheme - Rachel Spence, Law Clerk Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net Visit our website: www.wiselaw.net [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:50 pm
Baumbast v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Case C-413/99, [2002] ECR I-07091 was raised. [read post]
