Search for: "Sanford Levinson"
Results 261 - 280
of 343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
23 Jan 2006, 4:41 pm
Dorf repasa el tema a la luz de un libro del constitucionalista Sanford Levinson , "Constitutional Faith" (1988). [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:48 am
Professor Balkin's impressive article correctly sees the United States Constitution as the central icon in a civic religion capable of evoking redemptive action by its citizens -- Sanford Levinson's constitutional faith. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am
In 2006, for instance, University of Texas law professor Sanford Levinson wrote a well-received book, Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (and How We the People Can Correct It). [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:55 am
"--Sanford Levinson, Centennial Chair in Law and Professor of Government, University of Texas-Austin, and author of Our Undemocratic Constitution "Opponents of presidential power may be discomfited by Posner and Vermeule's argument that the imperial presidency is unavoidable in the modern world. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:49 am
Friedman, Notes toward a Sociology of Human Rights 25 Mark Tushnet, The Warren Court and the Limits of Justice 26 Elizabeth Borgwardt, "Constitutionalizing" Human Rights: The Rise and Rise of the Nuremberg Principles PART V THE PAST AND FUTURE OF LEGAL HISTORY 27 Yochai Benkler, Transformations in the Digitally Networked Environment 28 Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:13 pm
"My own bet," said Sanford Levinson, a law professor at the University of Texas, "is that Heller will more likely than not turn out to be of no significance to anyone but constitutional theorists. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
" -- Sanford Levinson | author of "Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We the People Can Correct It)" [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:47 am
The Welfare State (Sanford Levinson, University of Texas). 38. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:38 am
Drawing on previous work written with Sanford Levinson, this essay explains why that is not the case. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
With all the extensive discussion of the merits (or lack thereof) of the constitutional complaints against the health insurance mandate, it’s worth taking a moment to reflect on what it would mean if the Court struck it down.Jack Balkin and Sanford Levinson have distinguished two senses in which constitutional law decisions can be political. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 1:49 pm
o Sanford Levinson and Jack Balkin - Morton Horwitz and The Rule of Lawo Laura Kalman - Transformationso Bill Nelson - Who Should Judge Legal History: Lawyers or Historians? [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:22 am
Balkin’s perspective is positioned with the leanings of scholars like Mark Tushnet, , Sanford Levinson, William Eskridge, and Larry Kramer, who regard social and political movements to be important actors for “shifting the boundaries” of what are considered to be reasonable and plausible alternatives to existing inequalities. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:09 am
In his contribution to the 2012 Alexander Bickel Symposium, organized on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the publication of The Least Dangerous Branch, Professor Sanford Levinson wrote: “…what one finds among all of the Justices, whatever may be their disagreements on the substantive issues, is a remarkable insouciance regarding the Bickelian ‘passive virtues. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:56 am
Balkin writes: Both we [Balkin and his co-theorist Sanford Levinson] and Ackerman agree that if the public keeps returning a party to the White House, eventually this will result in changes in constitutional doctrine. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
But the odds of Newsom building a successful movement are slim, because it’s so difficult to amend the Constitution, said University of Texas law school professor Sanford Levinson. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:20 pm
Before I tell you why I think so, let me excerpt part of a fascinating discussion that was held by Law Professors Sanford Levinson and Jack Balkin on just that issue: As already suggested, though, my concerns about Roe, and whether the Democratic Party should continue to expend a great deal of political capital on keeping it on the books, have less to do with specifically legal concerns--i.e., what constitutes the best interpretation of the Constitution? [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
Since 2005, I have assigned 85 books by 79 authors, with Sandy Levinson, Gerard Magliocca, Eric Segall, Dan Farber, Philip Hamburger, and David Bernstein each making 2 appearances. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
United States,[12] which is considered the critical moment of 1935 by most scholars.[13] The resolution of the monetary question in favor of devaluation deprived the President’s populist critics of vital ammunition and allowed the country to avoid a repeat of the 1896 presidential campaign between William Jennings Bryan and William McKinley.[14] What makes Perry especially fascinating is that the decision presented two branches of government with tough dilemmas at the same time.[15] In a… [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
