Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 261 - 280
of 300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
But Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman made a fair historical and textual case that elected officials were not “officers,” and that included the president and vice president. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 1:40 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman highlighted a passage from Judge Wynn's concurrence in the Emoluments Clauses en banc decision: Without a doubt, a lawsuit brought by the State of Maryland and the District of Columbia against the President of the United States catches attention outside the walls of the courthouse. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:59 pm
" In a series of amicus briefs, Seth Barrett Tillman and I contended that these "official capacity" suits were not proper. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
My colleague Seth Barrett Tillman addressed this argument in September. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:38 am
For sure, Barrett was not among them, as she would tell us in her concurrence. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Worley] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, James Heilpern and Michael T. [read post]
15 Feb 2025, 4:51 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman wrote about such proposed plea bargains here. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[This post, which is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, continues from the first installment.] [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
Nebraska, Justice Barrett rejected the validity of substantive cannons altogether. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 10:33 am
(Maybe these are the sorts of "consequences" Seth Barrett Tillman worried about.) [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:41 am
(Seth Barrett Tillman and I explain why the holding of Nixon, whatever it is, was limited to some "unique" facts—which is precisely what the decision repeatedly stated.) [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 11:31 am
As I recall, Seth Barrett Tillman was the first person to raise the Scalia opinion in late December 2016. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
But Cf. the various works of Seth Barrett Tillman, who argues in a number of articles that a full Congress now could delegate to a post-attack Congress the power to enact legislation through only one house (the Senate, reconstituted via appointments) in the interim. ** There is an open question of constitutional quorums here. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm
" Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote in early 2020 that even if Trump were convicted of violating this statute, he could not be disqualified from serving a second term as President. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Graber, Their Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3 and Ours, Just Security (Feb. 16, 2021) James Wagstaffe, Time to Reconsider the 14th Amendment for Trump’s Role in the Insurrection, Just Security (Feb. 11, 2021) Media and Other Resources … [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 12:31 pm
But Seth Barrett Tillman has debunked that myth--no order ran against Lincoln, so there was no order for him to ignore. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" Seth Barrett Tillman and I are the primary proponents of the former argument, and Kurt Lash is the primary proponent of the latter argument. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
At the time, Seth Barrett Tillman and I acknowledged the easy case: the President receiving a "suitcase full of money" in exchange for performing some official act would amount to bribery. [read post]
