Search for: "Sherman v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 1,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
The New York Times’ Adam Liptak covers United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Gamble v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:15 am by NCC Staff
Adams was the first ambassador to Great Britain in 1787 and arrived back in the United States after the convention in 1788. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 9:50 am by Florian Mueller
I'm much less interested in what California will say, as the anti-anti-steering injunction was merely Epic's consolation prize while the strategically important battle here is over Epic's claims under federal antitrust law (Sherman Act).DOJ officials attended every single day of the spring 2021 trial, and the DOJ is rumored to be preparing its own United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:16 am by Jay Willis
United States and Padilla v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:34 am by Joy Waltemath
Court of Appeals in San Francisco to reverse a decision by a federal district court in Seattle that granted a motion to dismiss finding that the State of Washington clearly and affirmatively expressed a legislative decision to allow Seattle to displace competition in the for-hire driver service market (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:39 pm by Joshua Matz
Saudi Arabian Oil Co.Docket: 10-1393Issue(s): (1) Whether the political question doctrine deprives the federal courts of jurisdiction to adjudicate a Sherman Act and Clayton Act damage case against both private and state-owned businesses operating in the United States; and (2) whether the act of state doctrine bars antitrust claims against defendants whose conduct was commercial, and where it came to fruition and had its effect in the United… [read post]
Outokumpu Oyj et al., which alleges violations of the Sherman Act and the Tennessee Trade Practices Act. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 5:13 am
What I found particularly promising was the Court's statement that "[i]f the United States shows that an antitrust violation has occurred, such that equitable relief is warranted, the remedy can go beyond the prohibition of those practices, which, strictly speaking, were found to constitute the illegal conduct. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 5:09 pm by Bona Law PC
Independence Tube Corporation, for example, the United States Supreme Court held that the coordinated activities of a parent and its wholly-owned subsidiary are a single enterprise (incapable of conspiring) for purposes of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]