Search for: "Spanish v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2017, 9:28 am
Spanish Peaks, slip op. at p. 9, n. 4. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 1:28 pm
The abstract to the article states: In the recent case of Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
Indiana State Bar Assoc., et al v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
For example, in his argument to the Court in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 2:46 am
Marquez Brothers International, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 2:11 pm
Haynes thinks, and Judge Johnson agrees (at least until she reads U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am
But I recently came across a 2016 Ohio appellate case, State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 12:32 pm
Valdez v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:10 am
The state of the proceedings did not therefore permit final judgment to be given, so that Mega Brands’ application to dismiss the opposition in respect of the application to register its figurative mark had to be dismissed.Says the IPKat, this is another classic example of two trivial questions -- "will Spanish people who buy toys be confused between MAGNET 4 and the MAGNEXT word and figurative marks? [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 8:28 am
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:43 pm
Google Spain SL v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:43 pm
Google Spain SL v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:47 am
Page 1 2009 NY Slip Op 51445(U) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:06 pm
The case is Telecinco v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 2:41 am
That warning label, issued in both English and Spanish, stated the product was extremely flammable and should be kept away from heat/ sparks/ flame and should only be used with adequate ventilation. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 pm
Last week, Cherokee Nation District Court Judge John Cripps issued a decision (here) in the case of Nash v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:55 am
Case citation: Court of Master Sommeliers v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 5:42 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
Kluwer Trademark Blog discussed Alliance Pharmaceuticals Limited v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:29 am
The language of Regulation 13(2)(b), which stated that "the compensation body [here the MIB] shall compensate the injured party...as if...the accident had occurred in Great Britain", was clear on this point. [read post]
