Search for: "State v. Hale" Results 261 - 280 of 974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
Facts The facts of these cases can be very briefly stated. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 2:26 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale also stated that even if the court had been able to find the possession order disproportionate to her rights under art 8, the appellant could not assume that this would have led to the order being refused. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
By a majority (Lords Hope, Walker and Lady Hale dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have been lawfully detained was relevant to damages rather than to liability. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Bryan Heaney
The appeal is set down for a one day hearing before Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:25 am by Aimee Denholm
On the question of jurisdiction, it was held that Sala v SSHD [2016] UKUT 411 had rightly been overruled by the Court of Appeal in a subsequent decision on the interpretation of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1003), reg 26. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Hughes, Hodge, Lloyd-Jones unanimously dismissed the Government’s appeal. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
In the context of these applications, the fact of and reasons for his arrest were stated in open court. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am by HAZEL WRIGHT, HUNTERS SOLICITORS
Lord Wilson gives the lead majority judgment, with which Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Carnwath agree. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:13 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
The holding of the Fifth Circuit was that the Bankruptcy statute of limitations, contained in Section 108(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (two years) preempted the one year Louisiana statute of limitations for legal malpractice.The underlying action was a multi-million dollar judgment against Gary Eugene Hale, which forced him into bankruptcy. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:01 pm by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
Lady Hale, giving the leading judgment, firmly stated that “the immediately striking thing about this case is how much hard work has to be done in order to find that a member of an LLP is not a worker within the meaning of section 230(3)(b) of the 1996 Act. [read post]