Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 261 - 280
of 61,148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2013, 10:56 am
According to Our Hearts Rhinelander v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:22 pm
United States, 480 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:02 am
In Watts v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
In FTC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:52 pm
The meaning of "is" and the meaning of "substantially" are debated in the 2-1 CAFC decision inKruse v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 1:06 pm
Continue reading › The post Texas v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:17 am
Introduction Judgment of the Supreme Court is handed down today in the case of Janah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“SSFCA”) and Libya, and Benkharbouche v SSFCA. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court granted the petition for certiorari in Parties in FCC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:31 pm
Blue called in sick today, causing another delay in the case of State v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:32 pm
In reaching this decision, the trial judge relied on the defendant’s Employee Handbook to determine the meaning of a “probationary period”, stating he could not determine what the probationary period means “just by the contract”. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:51 am
Regina (New London College Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 51; [2012] WLR (D) 21 “The suspension or withdrawal of a general (student) sponsor licence granted to a United Kingdom college to sponsor and enrol students from non-European Economic Area countries on point based immigration control, to study in the college, was not an infringement of the college’s Convention right to its possessions within the meaning of article 1 of… [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:30 am
Brooks and Gamage’s work is especially timely given that the Supreme Court will rule on Moore v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
The post State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
On October 18, 2012, in Windsor v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:32 pm
The AEP v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 4:45 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling in Oklahoma v. [read post]
