Search for: "State v. Pfeifer" Results 261 - 277 of 277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2008, 4:29 am
"The stigma attached to sex offenders is significant, and the potential exists for ostracism and harassment, as the (State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:30 am
The court first tackled the issue of destruction of evidence two years ago in State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:14 am by Russ Bensing
  About twenty years after Wilson, the court in State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:13 am
  That argument’s never made any headway:   it was rejected in State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 11:59 am
Introducing his summary of the relevant cases with a recap of Von Hannover (and clarifying that the decision only related to the more anoydne, non-official photographs in the controversial case), Carolan discussed Pfeifer v Austria. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
In a series of case from about 2003, the ECtHR began to treat a person’s reputation as being capable of protection by Article 8 as part of the right to respect for private life: see, for example, Cumpana v Romania (2004) 41 EHRR 200 at [91], Chauvy v France (2004) 41 EHRR 610 at [70] and White v Sweden [2007] EMLR 1 at [21]. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:08 am by MBettman
Merit Decision On October 30, 2013, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am by INFORRM
  In such circumstances, and against the backdrop of the law generally in this field being in a state of rapid flux at this time, the Court of Appeal in Greene might certainly be forgiven if, with the benefit of hindsight, it appears that it failed to apply Re S correctly. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:33 am by Russ Bensing
Those were some of the questions raised by State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
While Article 8 may include a positive obligation on a member state to adopt measures to secure respect for private life between individuals, the state has a wide margin of appreciation as to what is required particularly where there is a balance between competing interests or Convention rights (see, for example, Evans v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 34 at [75], [77]; and see [81])  As a result, Article 8’s influence had led to the development in domestic law of a… [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]