Search for: "State v. Sellers"
Results 261 - 280
of 3,971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2007, 8:18 am
Until the last decade, states restricted sales of certain products by regulating the sellers. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:13 pm
EVELYN NYE v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 10:39 am
By Cori Badgley Sixells, LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
A New York federal judge's summary judgment ruling last week held that although phonographophiles may unload their LPs at yard sales, a company that served as an online marketplace for used digital music infringed on the copyright of a record company.United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Richard Sullivan's 19-page decision in Capitol Records LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 1:10 pm
In Ramirez v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 12:46 pm
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:22 am
Cutter & Buck, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 12:31 pm
(See Milliken v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 2:45 pm
Such was the case in Boyd v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 9:34 pm
Alexander Shukh v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Level 4 Yoga, LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Collab9, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:32 am
See Authentic Beverages Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 12:31 pm
In Gibbs v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 12:31 pm
In Gibbs v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:02 am
Earlier, in Pfizer v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 4:29 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:31 am
See CTIA -- The Wireless Association v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 2:19 pm
Sellers in the above examples will want the opposite.The "crystal ball" for the above referenced rule of thumb is the Ohio Supreme Court's ruling in Berea Bd. of Edn. v Cuyahoga Cty Bd. of Revision, 23 Ohio St. 3d 59 (2005). [read post]
