Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization" Results 261 - 280 of 4,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 5:10 am by Heidi Henson
Although disparate impact may be relevant evidence of discrimination such evidence is insufficient to prove a constitutional violation even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state action to strict scrutiny, the plurality explained, citing Board of Trustees of Univ of Ala v Garrett. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 5:20 pm by Aurora Barnes
State Board of Equalization; and (2) whether a local business license tax calculated based on gross receipts, which does not specifically target imports or exports, violates the import-export clause if some of the gross receipts include export sales. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State actors are the State of New York, Governor of the State of New York, the New York State Board of Regents, the New York State Education Department, and the New York State Commissioner of Education (collectively the State). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State actors are the State of New York, Governor of the State of New York, the New York State Board of Regents, the New York State Education Department, and the New York State Commissioner of Education (collectively the State). [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 11:50 am by Adam Feldman
UPS and almost heard a case regarding a dispute on transgender use of bathrooms in Virginia schools in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Greg Abbott, as chairman of the Texas State Preservation Board, forced the executive director of the Board to remove from the state capitol rotunda a previously-approved display by the Freedom From Religion Foundation of a Bill of Rights "nativity" scene. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
A lawsuit was filed last month in an Indiana state trial court by a Christian youth camp which objects to a zoning board's approval of a large dairy farm nearby. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:35 am by Patricia Salkin
The court rejected the Defendants’ ripeness argument, finding that the Resolutions issued by the Planning Board, which was not appealable to the Town’s Zoning Board of Appeals, constituted “final, definitive positions as to how it could use its property,” sufficient to establish the ripeness of its Equal Protection claim. [read post]