Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Miller" Results 261 - 280 of 1,706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2006, 6:14 am
The recent judgments of the House of Lords in Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, [2006] 1 FLR 1186 point to the urgent need for the courts to set aside the preposterous contention that it is 'substantially uncontestable' that substantial harm to the public would arise if prenuptial agreements were enforceable. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:36 am by Robert Wagner
by: Robert Wagner, intellectual property attorney at Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by NARF
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (Mohegan Torts Code; Spoilation; Negligence) In re Miller (Probate; Ancillary Probate in County Court) Rayton and Palmer v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:50 am by David G. Badertscher
DISTRICT COURTWESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Military Law Court-Martialed Officer's Habeas Challenge Transferred to Federal Court in Maryland Miller v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 8:51 am by Mark Tushnet
(For the cognescenti, I refer to Miller v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
[Abstract]. 58 Villanova Law Review 371-470 (2013).Symposium:  Law, Religion, and Lautsi v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
 And then there is the case of State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 11:47 am by Bart Torvik
" The current standard on obscenity, set out in Miller v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 2:52 pm by Michel-Adrien
This was perhaps best exemplified by the rendering of the verdict in R v Theriault, 2020 ONSC 5725 [Theriault], in June, in which over 20,000 people watched the verdict being read to hear whether the Theriault brothers, two off-duty police officers who pursued and injured Dafonte Miller, a Black teen, would be convicted of assault. [read post]