Search for: "Tompkins v. Tompkins" Results 261 - 280 of 350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am by Barry Sookman
Mar. 30, 2017) Tompkins v. 23andMe, Inc. 840 F.3d 1016 (9th.Cir.2016) Ingalls v Spotify USA, Inc 2016 WL 6679561 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
.* In Currier v Tompkins-Seneca-Tioga BOCES, 80 AD2d 979, the Appellate Division ruled that the reassignment of the work of the incumbent of an abolished position among five other (retained) employees, none being assigned more than 50% of the duties of the abolished position, was lawful.** Petitioner was reinstated as Director of Athletics, Physical Education, Health and Chairperson District-wide Health and Safety Team from the relevant preferred eligible list effective August 31, … [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Tompkins that federal courts must apply state law in diversity cases as opposed to the Swift v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:13 pm by PJ Blount
Luongo, Watchlists in United States and Canada: An Intricate Web, p.157 # Ruwantissa Abeyratne, The NW 253 Flight and the Global Framework of Aviation Security, p.167 # Special Report # Ruwantissa Abeyratne, Legal and Aeronautical Issues Concerning the Earthquake in Haiti, p.183 # Arpad Szakal, Conference Report European Air Law Association: 7th Munich Liability Seminar, p.195 # Case Note # Pablo Mendes de Leon, ATA and others v. the UK Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change… [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am by Will Baude
Tompkins – was a form of common law shared among Anglo-American jurisdictions, which could be expounded by any of them, but controlled by none of them. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:30 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  Congressman Jerry Nadler A Champion of the LGBT Community in the House and Original co-sponsor DOMA-Repeal Bill and Permanent Partners Immigration Act   Edie Windsor Plaintiff in the Windsor v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:57 am by Shams Hirji
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), speaks definitively on the meaning of Ohio law. [read post]