Search for: "Turner v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
Katfriends Morag MacDonald (Bird & Bird, left), Richard Vary (Nokia), Sally Field (Bristows) and the eponymous Mehmet Gün are there too, not to mention EPLAW Honorary President Pierre Véron, Margot Fröhlinger (all the way from Eponia), knowledgeable Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons), the dashing Justin Turner QC and, well, you can see for yourself who else is there ... [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:18 am
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court addressed in Turner v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:33 pm
Ginsburg United States V. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
Katzburg comported with the protections the United States Supreme Court mandated in Turner v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:55 am
United States (No. 13-127) Walker v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
United States, 13-632, Turner v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:10 am
In the case of Turner v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-127; Brewington v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
Turner v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:24 am
United States and Maxwell v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am
Turner v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
At most, their constitutional claims were subjected to relatively low-level scrutiny under Turner v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
United States, No. 13-632, and Johnson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm
Canada In the case of Bedessee Imports Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:58 am
In Turner v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:17 pm
United States, No. 13-403. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
Turner & Co., who sought to protect “EXCELSIOR No. 1 Peruvian Guano” for use in connection with fertilizer. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
The New York State courts have departed from the second prong of Strictland, adopting a rule somewhat more favorable to defendants as in People v Turner. [read post]