Search for: "United States v. Hernandez" Results 261 - 280 of 649
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2012, 8:06 am by Mark J. Rose, Esq.
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:15 pm
Hernandez, 418 F.3d 1206, 1212 n.7 (11th Cir. 2005) (stating that "[o]f trifles the law does not concern itself: De minimis non curat lex"); United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
Category: Administrative Law    By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor  TitleExela Pharama Sciences, LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5283, Garcia-Hernandez v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:06 am by Joel R. Brandes
On September 13, the court received a letter from Bertha stating that she would be staying in the United States indefinitely with Z.F.M.Z. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:59 pm
Category: Priority   By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor   TitleMedtronic Corevalve, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:25 pm by John Bellinger
First, Cisco is an American company with offices throughout the United States, including in this state. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:40 am
Category: Infringement     By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor    TitleLimelight Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
United States, 333 U.S. 10, 14 [1948]} -- compatible with any reasonable notion of personal privacy or ordered liberty would appear to us obvious. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by John Floyd
”   The Second Circuit Court of Appeals tackled this novel question in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am by Tobias Thienel
This doctrine holds,in the broadest outline, that English (like U.S.) courts 'will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory' (Underhill v Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897)) or 'will not adjudicate upon the transactions of foreign sovereign states' (Buttes Gas Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1982] AC 888, 931G). [read post]