Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit"
Results 261 - 280
of 5,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2012, 1:13 pm
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has joined the Third Circuit, Ninth Circuit and Tenth Circuit Courts in upholding the right of the spouse of a nursing home resident to purchase a Medicaid annuity to protect her financial security.In 2008 John Lopes entered a skilled nursing facility in Connecticut. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 11:33 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Marks v. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 3:43 pm
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Friday ruled against the Trump administration’s immigration policy. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
On Thursday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion in Hohlbein v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:41 am
More sensationally, check out the Ninth Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 2:39 pm
Sessions III [AG]; No. 16-73801, United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:32 pm
Chaudhuri, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the National Indian Gaming Commission (Commission) did not violate the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) when it approved the Jamul Indian Village’s gaming ordinance without first conducting any environmental review under NEPA. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 3:23 am
A panel on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit seemed to be channeling the lyrics of the musical Hamilton in noting that “Everything is legal in New Jersey. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 12:55 pm
Please read the statement here.The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is seeking applicants from among the federal appellate bar to serve as Appellate Lawyer Representatives to the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:33 pm
The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversing the district court and granting a conditional preliminary injunction is vacated.No dissent is noted. [read post]
21 Jan 2003, 2:02 pm
Read United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:21 am
Lower court materials here and here. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 1:47 pm
” The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) found “that this conviction was a crime involving moral turpitude that made him ineligible for cancellation of removal” from the United States. [read post]
2 May 2024, 4:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a former federal employee can sue the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:24 am
Never shy about dancing to the beat of its own drum, in a sharply split 6-5 en banc decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the certification of one of the largest classes in history. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:06 pm
Nov. 28, 2023), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the Canada-based company Shopify, Inc. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:03 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the federal appellate court with jurisdiction over much of the western United States (including Washington, Oregon, California and Idaho), ruled last week that an employee’s temporary impairment can qualify as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:03 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the federal appellate court with jurisdiction over much of the western United States (including Washington, Oregon, California and Idaho), ruled last week that an employee’s temporary impairment can qualify as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:59 pm
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held [opinion, PDF] that the US District Court for the Southern District of California made no error when basing Alejandra Tapia's sentence on speculation that... [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has issued a decision stating a law firm’s client may pursue a legal malpractice case against her former attorneys despite that she was unable to pay her share of mandatory arbitration expenses. [read post]
